Forum Jove BCN: Barcelona’s Youth Forum

Citizens’ assembly empowers Barcelona youth to develop recommendations for the city council

 

Project website

Name: Forum Jove BCN: Barcelona’s Youth Forum

Topic: Citizens’ assembly

Location: Barcelona, Spain

Implementation Level: city

Owner: 

Barcelona City Council

Years in operation: 2021 - present

Platforms: In-person deliberation

Contact Information: , 

Contact Email: [email protected]

CASE STUDY LAST UPDATED: 11/29/2022

This case study is part of a series on Youth Democracy. Click to find the others on Nuortenbudjetti: Helsinki’s Youth Budget and Creamos: Co-creating youth-led social innovation projects in Chile.

 

Introduction

In recent years, Barcelona has witnessed an increasing number of violent youth protests. Throughout the majority of these protests, there was a sense among Barcelonian youth that their city council had failed to set up initiatives that empowered them. In response to the general discontent among youth, the Barcelona City Council established Forum Jove BCN, a citizens’ assembly that allows young people in Barcelona to develop recommendations for the city council to address their needs within the city. One of these recommendations–that was recently approved by the city council–is Operació “Coneix els teus recursos” (Operation “Know your resources''). It involves providing young people with access to government-managed resources for personal development; increasing communication between young people and the city government; and optimizing the way that information is dispersed to the city’s younger residents.1

 

Launched in 2021, Forum Jove BCN, (“BCN Youth Forum”in English, or “Foro Joven BCN” in Spanish), is a deliberative assembly of 99 young people, ages  16-29, who are charged with making recommendations to the Barcelona City Council regarding policies that impact young people in the city.2 As the COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted young people’s ability to find jobs, access housing, and emotional health support, the Barcelona City Council developed Foro Joven BCN to generate policies using the recommendations of those closest to these problems. 

            Bcn2

Fig 1: FòrumJoveBCN participants discuss the framing questions for the deliberative assembly. Image Credit: Deliberativa

 

The forum empowers young people to meaningfully participate in policymaking at the city level by identifying and discussing their needs. It also encourages them to develop solutions to these needs within the city of Barcelona. 

 

How Does it Work?

Forum Jove is a deliberative assembly where members meet to debate and develop recommendations for the Barcelona City Council. The council, in turn, helps to inform youth policies within the city. In its first year, the City Council asked the assembly to respond to the question:

 

“As a young person who lives in Barcelona, what would you need to carry out your life project?”

 

The Forum Jove BCN involves five phases:

 

  1. Selection of Participants

    First, a city council staff member developed a sample of possible participants that was representative of the age, gender, and socio-economic backgrounds of Barcelona’s youth population. Then, using the city’s database of addresses, Barcelona civil servants sent letters to the selected young people, inviting them to participate in the assembly. In total, 99 young people were brought together to participate in the assembly, which lasted for 6 weekends.
  2.  Agenda setting 

    The first two weekends were used to establish a working agenda for the assembly. The assembly members brainstormed responses to the question ‘As a young person who lives in Barcelona, what would you need to carry out your life project?’3 They chose three themes to focus on: Education, Emancipation and Mental Health, which to them encompassed the major issues affecting young people living within the city of Barcelona. Following this, the assembly members articulated framing questions that would guide discussion and debate around each of the three themes. 

  3. Debate and proposal generation: 

    For the remaining four weekends, the 99 member assembly was split by lottery into three subgroups, each aligned with one theme, with approximately 30 participants in each group. Each group was tasked with deliberating and developing recommendations in response to their respective framing questions. 

     

    For the group that worked on Education, their framing question was: 

     

    “How can the City Council offer a labor, emotional, academic and values guidance service in the educational stage and beyond? Sub-question: What ways can the City Council improve and offer to disseminate the services it offers to different age groups?”

     

    As for the group that worked on Emancipation, their question was:

     

    “How can the City Council train, accompany and help youth so that they can emancipate themselves, from the age of 27, despite socioeconomic limitations?”

     

    Finally the group that worked on Mental Health, their framing question was:

     

    “How can the City Council promote (raise awareness, motivate, normalize) and provide resources to help (in work groups, workshops...) the mental and emotional health of young people in all the Districts of Barcelona?” 

     

    The assembly developed 27 recommendations as a result of the debate phase. Each recommendation had to gain at least 70% support from the entire youth assembly, in order to make it to the list of recommendations that was sent to the Barcelona City Council for approval.4


  4.  Study of recommendations:

    Following the deliberation phase, the assembly delivered 22 recommendations for study by the City Council (Five of the 27 recommendations were omitted as they did not achieve the 70% support threshold). Five of these recommendations pertained to Education, eight pertained to Emancipation, and the remaining nine pertained to Mental Health.1 The City Council then evaluated the recommendations to determine whether their suggested actions were within the jurisdiction and scope of the City Council to implement. 

  5. Return: 

    In the “return” phase, the Barcelona City Council provided Forum Jove BCN participants with feedback on their recommendations and explained which they accepted and which they rejected.3

     

    The City Council rejected only two out of the 22 recommendations that were presented, one of which fell under the theme of Emancipation, and the other the theme of Mental Health. One of the rejected recommendations advocated that the Madrid City Council require companies that want to work for the City Council to reserve jobs for inexperienced and experienced young people. This recommendation was rejected by the Barcelona City Council because it suggested an action that could force companies to hire inexperienced employees, which is not allowed under the city’s current legal framework. The other rejected recommendation called on the Barcelona City Council to subsidize and expand the city’s public mental health system by incorporating a broader range of services and activities such as private professional consultations and alternative therapy services for young people. It was rejected as the city did not see this recommendation as viable in its original format, and did not have the budget to support the recommendation.

     

    The City Council used Decidim - a digital platform developed in Barcelona to facilitate citizen participation - to publish the results of Forum Jove BCN’s recommendations. In addition, the Barcelona City Council worked with a consultant, Deliberativa - a Spanish civil society organization which provides research, design, and training support for participatory democracy projects - throughout the process. The City Council also allocated funds from its budget to facilitate the process.

Bcn1

Fig 2: FòrumJoveBCN participants developed recommendations around three thematic areas: Education, Emancipation, and Mental Health. Image Credit: Deliberativa

 

Who Participates?

99 young people within the ages of 16-29 years old participated in the assembly. These young people were selected through a sortition process whereby a city council staff member selects a representative sample of young people by lottery, from across the districts within the city of Barcelona. This sample took into account the age, gender and socioeconomic standings of the young people in these districts. During the sortition process, Deliverativa helped the Barcelona City Council to select sample criteria for members of the assembly, while City Council staff mailed the letters to participants and ensured that the final group was  a representative sample.  



Outcome and Impacts

The City Council accepted (i.e. committed to implement as policies) 20 of the recommendations issued by the assembly. Fifteen of these recommendations were approved with some degree of modifications.1 The 20 approved recommendations were then added to a final report that was presented to the mayor of Barcelona for further consideration and then implementation. The goal moving forward is to meet back in a year from now and track what stage of implementation has been reached.

 

An example of a recommendation that was accepted by the Barcelona City Council was “Fòrum Jove i habitatge” (“Youth and Housing Forum”in English), under the Emancipation theme. This recommendation encouraged the Barcelona City Council to hold a yearly forum for young people that would aid in detecting their housing needs and problems, while also allowing them to create proposals to solve them. The recommendation was welcomed since Barcelona already regularly holds a general housing and rehabilitation forum (known as the “Fòrum d’Habitatge i Rehabilitació de Barcelona [FHAR]).” The city council believed that this recommendation could be accommodated within the existing FHAR framework where professionals, and participants, gather ideas, and provide expert advice concerning alternatives to housing in the city.1

 

It is difficult to measure the initiative’s overall impact, as the Forum Jove BCN is a recently established youth citizen engagement initiative whose initial recommendations and policy outcomes have not yet come to fruition. However, the initiative has shown some positive strides that are worth acknowledging. According to Mr. Yago Bermejo Abati, Co-director of Deliberativa, the deliberative process of Forum Jove BCN “tries to give autonomy to the participants” regarding agenda setting. The process empowered participants to work neutrally in regard to decision making, and to develop recommendations that are rooted in the lived experiences and expertise of Barcelona’s youth.

 

Lessons Learned

  • Experiment with new models - While governments, nonprofits, and advocacy groups have experimented with the citizens’ assembly model to convene deliberations around climate change, corruption, abortion, and road safety, Forum Jove BCN is unique for its use of the deliberative assembly approach to amplify the voices of young people. The assembly model signaled to young people that the City Council is making an effort to prioritize the problems affecting them in society. This, in turn, may encourage more and better participation among the youth.

 

  • Have a clear strategy - Having a clear strategy regarding how stages within a platform would progress is necessary to ensure that the process runs smoothly. As an example, in the case of Forum Jove BCN, the process of running the three groups of young people that addressed the problems of Education, Emancipation, and Mental Health, was a great challenge logistically. As Mr Bermejo Abati put it, “dividing an assembly in three blocks is like delivering three assemblies.” 4 So, developing a streamlined strategy that acknowledges context specific limitations is important to avoid future challenges regarding this kind of model. In addition, in terms of agenda setting, a bottom-up approach worked quite well with Forum Jove BCN, as it allowed assembly members themselves - rather than the legislature, executive, or interest groups - to select the topics to focus on. 


Diversify language offerings - One challenge that Forum Jove BCN faced was a high dropout rate among assembly members who are immigrants. One possible reason for this trend is that these individuals - who were largely immigrants from Latin America - may have been more comfortable working with the Spanish language, rather than Catalan, which was the predominant language choice in the Forum Jove BCN deliberative assembly. As well, it should be noted that of the youth population in Barcelona, approximately 40% is comprised of immigrants.4 Therefore, in the future, the deliberative assembly is looking to diversify its language offerings to encourage and retain the participation of diverse youth demographics. 

End notes

1. Ajuntament de Barcelona, “DOCUMENT DE RETORN FÒRUM JOVE,” February 17, 2022. https://ajbcn-decidim-barcelona.s3.amazonaws.com/decidim-barcelona/uploads/decidim/attachment/file/13418/DocumentRetorn_ForumJove.pdf 

2. It should be noted that the project is known as both “Forum Jove BCN” (in Catalan) and “Foro Joven BCN” (in Spanish). We use both terms interchangeably in this case study.

3. See https://www.decidim.barcelona/processes/forumjoveBCN?locale=es

4. Interview with Mr. Yago Bermejo Abati, Co-director of Deliberativa